Research Notes
What published research says about attention, interruptions, timing and trusting an AI with your day. Plain answers, every claim tied to a source you can check.
- published studies and classic papers
- 40
- universities, hospitals and research labs
- 50
- countries
- 10
- years of research, 1966–2026
- 60
- citations checked against DOI, arXiv, publisher or library records
- 40/40
Institutions where the studies behind these notes were written. They are not affiliated with Tre-Up and do not endorse it.
Updated 10 October 2026
Start with a question
Questions people ask about focus, interruptions and AI. Answered with sources.
- 01Do phone notifications hurt focus, even if I don't check them?Yes. In a 2015 Florida State University experiment, simply receiving a notification hurt performance on an attention-demanding task about as much as calling or texting, even when people never touched the phone. In a field experiment with 221 adults (Kushlev et al., 2016), people reported more inattention in the week their alerts were on.Interruptions and attention
- 02Should I turn off notifications completely, or batch them?The best evidence favours batching. In a randomized field experiment with 237 people (Duke and Georgetown, 2019), getting notifications in three batches a day made people feel more attentive, productive and in control than the usual stream, while getting none brought few of those benefits and more anxiety and fear of missing out.Interruptions and attention
- 03Why is it so hard to get back to work after an interruption?Because part of your attention stays with the task you left. Sophie Leroy's 2009 experiments at the University of Minnesota call this attention residue: people who switched before finishing did worse on the next task, and a 2008 study by UC Irvine and Humboldt University researchers found interrupted people sped up to compensate, at the cost of more stress and frustration.Interruptions and attention
- 04When is the right moment for a reminder or a nudge?When the person is able to take it in, which changes from moment to moment. In a trial with 1,255 users of a workplace well-being app (Bidargaddi et al., 2018), the same message made people about 4% more likely to use the app in the next day, and about 12% more likely at 12:30 on weekends.Timing and receptivity
- 05Do reminder apps change what people do, or just how often they open the app?Often only the second. In a six-month University of Michigan trial with 287 adults with high blood pressure (Golbus et al., 2026), notifications made people use the app more but did not raise steps in the next hour or improve food choices the next day. Opening an app is engagement, not benefit.Engagement is not benefit
- 06Why do I push back when an app tells me what to do?Because being pushed feels like losing a freedom, and people act to win it back; psychologists call this reactance. In an experiment with 394 people (Richards et al., 2022), simply reminding them the choice was theirs reduced the pushback against health messages, and the effect was still there a week later.Autonomy and wording
- 07Should I trust an AI's advice about how to spend my day?Trust it as far as it has earned, and no further. Across six experiments, people followed advice more readily when they believed it came from an algorithm rather than a person (Logg et al., 2019), yet watching an automated aid make mistakes made them distrust even a reliable one (Dzindolet et al., 2003).Trust and uncertainty
- 08How should an AI say it isn't sure?Plainly, and without inventing a confidence number. Modern neural networks are often over-confident (Guo et al., 2017), and a system allowed to decline uncertain cases makes far fewer errors on the ones it answers (Geifman and El-Yaniv, 2017); a 2019 review led from the University of Cambridge found that admitting uncertainty does not necessarily cost trust.Trust and uncertainty
- 09How can an app help me if it doesn't know me yet?By asking, briefly, instead of guessing. A 2023 systematic review (Yuan and Hernandez) treats the 'cold start', a new user with no history, as its own problem, and asking the person directly is one approach that works from the first day. Later, fresh answers should outweigh old patterns, because preferences drift (Koren, 2009).Learning a person
- 10When is it better for an AI assistant to say nothing?Whenever speaking would cost more attention than it gives back: when the person can't take it in, the evidence is thin, or nothing needs to change. The 2018 framework for just-in-time support (Nahum-Shani et al.) counts giving nothing as a designed option, and declining uncertain cases makes a system's other answers more reliable (Geifman and El-Yaniv, 2017).Timing and receptivity
- 11If I delete my data from an app, is it deleted from backups too?Eventually, but usually not at the same moment. EU and UK law require erasure without undue delay, and the UK regulator, the ICO, says backups count but may be put 'beyond use' until they are overwritten; Google Cloud commits to deleting customer data within about six months, and some backups are locked so that no one can delete them early.Privacy and deletion
- 12Is there an app that notices when my day is slipping and suggests one next step?Tre-Up, an iOS app in development, is being built for exactly that, and it is not released yet: its AI, Pursue, is designed to notice when your focus or energy shifts and to answer with one small next step, one question, or nothing. Until it ships, your phone's focus modes and scheduled notification summaries cover part of the job.Timing and receptivity
Topics
Seven groups, one subject: the moment a day slips.
- 01Timing and receptivityWhen help lands, and when the same help is just noise.





+16 more15 sources · 22 institutions · 3 notes - 02Interruptions and attentionWhat a ping, a switch or an unfinished task costs the mind.





+9 more12 sources · 15 institutions · 3 notes - 03Engagement is not benefitWhy opening an app more often is not proof that it helps.





+8 more8 sources · 14 institutions · 1 note - 04Autonomy and wordingWhy people push back on advice, and the words that make it easier to hear.
3 sources · 1 institution · 1 note - 05Trust and uncertaintyHow people come to rely on automated advice, and how a system should admit what it doesn't know.





+6 more10 sources · 12 institutions · 2 notes - 06Learning a personHow a system can help someone it barely knows yet, and why fresh answers beat old patterns.




+4 more5 sources · 10 institutions · 1 note - 07Privacy and deletionWhat deleting your data really means, from the law to the backup tape.
15 sources · 1 institution · 1 note
Where the research comes from
50 institutions in 10 countries.
The studies behind these notes were written at universities, hospitals and industry research labs. Institutions are the authors' affiliations as printed in each publication. Naming them says where the research was done. They are not affiliated with Tre-Up and do not endorse Tre-Up or Pursue.
United States28 institutions
Arizona State University
Catholic University of America
Columbia University
Cornell University
Duke University
Florida State University
Georgetown University
Harvard University
Nahum-Shani & Murphy, 2026, Klasnja et al., 2019, Bidargaddi et al., 2018, Bell et al., 2023, Logg et al., 2019, Buçinca et al., 2021, Liao et al., 2020
Honeywell Technology Center
IBM Research
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Microsoft Research
Northwell Health
Northwestern University
Partnership for Drug-Free Kids
Pennsylvania State University
Stanford University
University of California, Berkeley
University of California, Irvine
University of California, San Diego
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
University of Iowa
University of Michigan
Nahum-Shani et al., 2018, Nahum-Shani & Murphy, 2026, Klasnja et al., 2019, Bidargaddi et al., 2018, Klasnja et al., 2015, Golbus et al., 2026, Liao et al., 2020
University of Minnesota
University of New Mexico
University of Pittsburgh
University of Rochester
University of Virginia
United Kingdom5 institutions
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
University College London
University of Birmingham
University of Cambridge
University of Warwick
Canada3 institutions
University of Alberta
University of British Columbia
University of Calgary
China3 institutions
Shandong University
Tencent
University of Science and Technology of China
Israel3 institutions
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
University of Haifa
Yahoo! Research
Japan3 institutions
Keio University
Shizuoka University
Yahoo Japan Corporation
Germany2 institutions
Heidelberg University
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Australia1 institution
Flinders University
Slovenia1 institution
University of Ljubljana
Spain1 institution
Telefónica Research
How these notes are made
Read, checked, written in our own words.
Three steps, shown on one real source: Mark et al., 2008, behind the note on getting back to work after an interruption.
- 01
Find
Pursue Lab, Tre-Up's research process, looks for published studies that bear on one question at a time.
The question
Why is it so hard to get back to work after an interruption?Mark G, Gudith D, Klocke U (2008). The cost of interrupted work: more speed and stress. Proceedings of CHI 2008, 107–110. - 02
Check
Every citation is matched to its DOI, arXiv or publisher record. A source we cannot confirm is marked as unconfirmed, never quietly kept.
The record
Confirmed against the DOI record: doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357072Written at University of California, Irvine and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. - 03
Summarise
We write what a study found in our own words, say what it did not show, and link to the original. We don't republish papers, figures or paywalled text.
In our words
Interrupted people finished their tasks faster and just as well, but paid for it: more stress, frustration, time pressure and effort. They seem to make up for interruptions by speeding up.Where it stops: A short lab task. It does not measure how long it takes to get back on track, and gives no minutes figure.The full source page
Research Notes are general information, not medical advice.
About Tre-Up
Tre-Up is an iOS app in development, built by its founder in Istanbul, Türkiye, and not yet incorporated. It is a behavioral decision system: it is designed to help people notice the moment their day starts to slip and decide what to do next.
Pursue is the AI inside Tre-Up. When your focus, energy or rhythm shifts, Pursue is designed to answer with one small next step, a single question, or nothing at all when nothing needs to change. The research on this page is why it is designed to stay quiet more often than it speaks.
Tre-Up does not sell your data. Not personal, not anonymous, not pooled.
The AI inside Tre-Up
Tre-Up is built on this research.
Pursue, the AI inside Tre-Up, is designed to notice when your day starts to slip and offer one small next step. The iOS app is in development. Invitations go out in small groups; leave your email and we will contact you when yours is ready.
Your email is used only for your invitation and important product updates. It is never sold. Unsubscribe at any time. Privacy policy
